Sudanese military expert Major General Najmuddin Abdel Mahmoud affirmed that Sudan is in urgent need of political reconciliation accompanied by social stability and economic prosperity to lift the country out of its current situation. He stated that the Sudanese people are among the most opposed to "Israel" and that there are Zionist, international, and regional influences behind igniting the war in Sudan to implement a project to fragment the country's unity.
He continued discussing the future prospects of Sudan and everything related to it in this interview with "Al-Mujtama."
What is the future of Sudan amid the ongoing conflict today?
— There is no doubt that Sudan, in the face of these conflicts, urgently needs political reconciliation first, followed by social reconciliation. Then, political parties with clear programs that enjoy the consensus of the Sudanese people should emerge. This would lead to the desired political stability, followed by economic stability.
This conflict has been historical since independence, a period marked by conflicts. One year before the departure of the colonial powers, a war broke out in South Sudan, which continued until the South seceded and became a Christian state. Several reasons contributed to this conflict and the state of instability, including Sudan's resistance to colonial rule and the presence of ancient kingdoms with autonomy, such as Alwa, Soba, Senar, and Fur. An example of this is the death of Gordon Pasha in Khartoum, a leader whom the British in Britain admired and who had inflicted much suffering on the Indians. This leader was killed in Khartoum, and the British and Westerners have not forgotten him easily.
Sudan Needs Political Reconciliation and Social Stability to Become the Breadbasket of the Islamic World Again
The Western ambitions for Sudan's natural resources—such as oil, gas, iron, gold, uranium, fertile agricultural lands, abundant groundwater, river waters, rainfall, and livestock—along with Sudan's strategic location in the heart of the world, connecting the Arab world with Africa, Central Africa, and the Horn of Africa, contribute to the targeting of Sudan.
Additionally, the ethnic and tribal diversity in Sudan, which colonial powers attempted to exploit to create divisions within the social fabric of the country, is another cause of the conflict. Colonial policies, such as the closed areas policy, led to the Christianization of South Sudan and the Islamization of North Sudan, which are factors in the ongoing conflict, now at its peak.
Is there a possibility of reaching a resolution to stop the fighting in the country?
- Certainly, there is a possibility to stop the fighting, and it must be stopped. There is a dubious international and regional scheme against Sudan's unity, aiming to fragment it. Once the proponents of this project see that it has failed—either through the defeat of the rebellion or through a peace agreement leading to the surrender of the rebel forces—this war will stop. This is possible and feasible, as the war has not yet turned into a civil war.
What is the role of Islamists in the current situation in Sudan?
- After the ousting of the Islamic government in 2019, Islamists distanced themselves from power and political activity. However, in the current security situation that has forced them to participate in this war, they are actively involved, just like other political factions. This war has become one between the Sudanese people—represented by the armed forces, political parties, and national forces—and the "Rapid Support Forces" and those behind the project to dismantle Sudan.
Islamists are an Integral Part of Resolving the Ongoing Conflict in Favor of the Stability and Unity of the Country
Therefore, Islamists are now an integral part of resolving the ongoing conflict in Sudan, as they are the most organized and popular group. They are certainly expected to play a role in any upcoming elections with a clear program and to be influential in shaping Sudan's political future.
How can regional conspiracies against Sudan be confronted?
– This can be achieved through political stability, unifying the internal front, and restoring a stable political system, which would thwart these international conspiracies against Sudan.
What is the state of the humanitarian situation in Sudan after more than a year of internal conflict?
– The humanitarian situation in some areas controlled by the "Rapid Support Forces" is very complex and dire, with widespread displacement and refugees seeking asylum in neighboring countries. However, in most of Sudan's war-free states, the humanitarian situation is stable concerning food supplies and health aspects, although conditions are poor, resources are available.
Sudan is known for its food production; therefore, many of its states have not been heavily affected by the war. The country’s abundant food production has led to a surplus, making prices very low and availability high, exceeding local consumption due to increased supply.
Nonetheless, there is still a humanitarian crisis and international and regional negligence regarding the plight of the Sudanese people concerning humanitarian aid. This is a lengthy issue, and there seems to be no one willing to stop this ongoing war, which has lasted for 15 months.
Who is behind the "Rapid Support Forces," and what is the objective?
– Many entities stand behind the "Rapid Support Forces," some of which are deeply involved in this project and others acting as bridges for Sudan’s enemies. It appears that a Gulf country and some neighboring countries provide logistical support, and this country serves as a transit point for those aiming to fragment Sudan, including Israel, the United States, and some European countries.
The Humanitarian Situation is Extremely Bad in Areas Controlled by the 'Rapid Support Forces' for Over a Year
This is an old project from the 1980s to divide and fragment Sudan. This support, whether logistical or through hordes of mercenaries or various technologies—even the rebel forces move with information via satellites from some countries sponsoring this project—has been closely monitored.
What are the bitter results of Sudan’s normalization with Israel?
– Normalization with Israel has not been completed. Some meetings have yielded nothing, and there are no benefits from the relationship with Israel. These meetings, whether with Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemedti), or the leaders of the rebel militias, show that the Israelis know these individuals do not represent the Sudanese people, who are among the most antagonistic towards Israel and its entity.
Moreover, the Sudanese passport is the only one in the world that states, "Permitted to all countries except Israel," and the Islamic world remembers the Sudanese people's stance at the 1967 Khartoum Summit with the famous "Three No's" (No recognition, No negotiation, No normalization). Therefore, the Zionists know that these meetings cannot lead to normalization with the Sudanese people, especially under a stable government.
Israeli involvement is also evident in this war through arms, communications, and modern technologies related to satellite information, guiding and supporting the rebel forces with weapons.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Read this Article in Arabic
