The English website of the Islamic magazine - Al-Mujtama.
A leading source of global Islamic and Arabic news, views and information for more than 50 years.
Muslims in India constitute about 14% of the country's total population, making them the largest religious minority in a nation characterized by great cultural and linguistic diversity. However, this large community is not a homogeneous bloc as perceived by some political parties and forces; rather, identities among Muslims are diverse based on linguistic, social, economic, and sectarian divisions, reflecting internal richness and diversity in their interests and aspirations.
Nevertheless, Muslims face issues in achieving effective political representation. Political forces either treat them as victims in need of protection or as adversaries that need to be confronted. In this context, the question arises: How can this diverse community move beyond these stereotypes and participate effectively in shaping Indian politics? How can social and political justice for Muslims be realized within this complex landscape?
It is a misconception to assume that Muslims in India represent a unified bloc with a single interest. There are clear linguistic, cultural, and economic differences among their communities; for instance, Muslims in Kerala differ from their counterparts in Uttar Pradesh in terms of language, education, and living standards. Additionally, there are sectarian differences between Sunnis and Shias, along with other disparities.
This diversity suggests that representation policies should reflect these variances rather than attempt to group Muslims under a single umbrella. Demanding a unified political bloc for Muslims is not only unrealistic but also harmful to their interests. What is required is the adoption of policies that allow different Muslim communities to represent themselves according to their own priorities, whether in education, health, or economic issues.
Failure of Traditional Political Representation
The Muslim minority in India suffers from a duality in political treatment; on one hand, they are portrayed by some political forces as a threat to national identity, while on the other hand, they are treated by other parties as a block in need of protection and care.
Political parties in India, whether secular or communal, have relied on politically exploiting Muslims. Right-wing parties, such as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), utilize anti-Muslim rhetoric to strengthen their Hindu base, while secular parties often present Muslims as victims in need of support, effectively marginalizing them in both scenarios.
Some right-wing parties, like the BJP, rely on inflaming sectarian sentiments, portraying Muslims as a danger to Hindu identity. This discourse seeks to politically exclude Muslims by sidelining them in development plans and restricting their participation in decision-making.
Conversely, some secular parties aim to depict Muslims as victims requiring continuous support, creating a dependency relationship. This approach does not enhance the actual empowerment of the Muslim community but rather entrench the perception that they are incapable of representing themselves politically and always require intermediaries from outside their community.
This pattern of dual treatment generates frustration among Muslims and creates a sense of powerlessness, as they find themselves trapped between an exclusionary hostile discourse and a "protective" rhetoric that undermines their capacity for effective political participation. While parties seek their votes, their real issues such as education, unemployment, and healthcare are seldom addressed seriously.
Secular guilt
One of the fundamental problems facing the political representation of Muslims in India is that secular discourse often reacts to the sectarian policies of the BJP. When the ruling party promotes the idea that Muslims pose a threat, secular parties hasten to present them as victims. This approach reinforces the stereotype of Muslims as a single bloc without acknowledging their diversity and varying needs.
Moreover, there is sometimes what is known as "secular guilt," where some secular political figures try too hard to demonstrate their sympathy for Muslims, which can be counterproductive. While this sympathy aims to protect Muslims, it simultaneously reinforces the perception that Muslims are unable to represent themselves and always need guardians from outside their community.
Towards a New Policy
Overcoming these challenges requires adopting a new policy for Muslims in India, which recognizes their internal diversity and builds alliances based on common interests with other marginalized groups. The struggle of Muslims should be linked with the struggles of Dalits, tribal communities, and other minorities that also face discrimination and exclusion in Indian society.
Some leaders and thinkers believe that Muslims should work towards building policies based on productivity and effective community participation. The focus should be on common issues such as unemployment, poverty, education, and healthcare rather than exclusively on religious identity.
There is also an urgent need to activate the role of Muslims in unions and social movements, moving away from religious discourse that is politically exploited. Building alliances based on economic and social interests can be more effective than focusing solely on religious identity.
Reforming Internal Leadership
To achieve genuine transformation, Muslims also need to reform the internal leadership of their community. New leaders are needed who can represent the diverse interests of Muslims rather than focusing only on religious issues. The leadership should be prepared to engage with contemporary issues such as technology, employment, and move beyond traditional discourse that addresses only a few religious matters, instead expanding into other areas of life.
Towards a More Inclusive Future
Muslims in India are not merely victims of sectarian politics or tools in the hands of secular parties; they are a community rich in diversity that can be an effective partner in building the future of India. However, achieving this requires transcending narrow perceptions that confine Muslims to a specific framework and working towards establishing policies that acknowledge their internal diversity and broaden their space for effective participation.
The future of Indian politics must be based on overcoming narrow personal identities and building alliances based on common interests. Muslims in India have the opportunity to realize this transformation, but this requires them to liberate themselves from the victim role and work towards building a future based on participation and empowerment.
Muslims in India are a community rich in diversity and can be an effective partner in building the future of the country, but this will not be achieved unless the narrow perceptions that confine them to a traditional or political victim framework are transcended. The future requires a policy that recognizes the internal diversity of Muslims and builds partnerships based on common interests with other marginalized groups.
It is essential for Muslims to free themselves from the role of victims and adopt a discourse based on productivity and self-empowerment. With this approach, they can overcome the constraints imposed by sectarian and secular politics, becoming an influential force in national decision-making.
The future of politics in India depends on transcending narrow identities and building an inclusive society for all its components. In this context, Muslims have a significant opportunity to bring about real change by enhancing their participation in all political, social, and economic fields. With this approach, the Muslim community can achieve effective political representation that reflects its interests and aspirations, and actively participate in building a more just and cohesive India for everyone.
========