The English website of the Islamic magazine - Al-Mujtama.
A leading source of global Islamic and Arabic news, views and information for more than 50 years.
NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — The Ethiopian Human Rights Commission says more than 100 people have been killed in the latest massacre along ethnic lines in the western part of the country.
The Amhara Mass Media Agency, affiliated with the country's Amhara region, in a separate report cited witnesses as saying the attack occurred early Wednesday in the Metekel zone of the Benishangul-Gumuz region.
The attack occurred a day after Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed visited the region and spoke about the need to bring those responsible for recent attacks to justice. Ethnic tensions are a major challenge as Abiy tries to promote national unity in a country with more than 80 ethnic groups.
Some people in remote villages remained encircled and under threat on Wednesday evening, with the overall death toll above 200, asserted Belete Molla, head of the National Movement of Amhara political party. He said he had spoken by phone with some residents.
It was not immediately clear who the attackers were, though Belete asserted that they were Gumuz militia members. The ruling party in the region, the Benishangul-Gumuz Prosperity Party, said in a statement that “armed bandits” had committed a “horrifying crime.”
Amharas are the second most populous ethnic group in Ethiopia. Amharas in the region have been targeted repeatedly in recent weeks.
One rebel attack on Nov. 1 in the far western Oromia region killed at least 54 people, according to Amnesty International.
An attack in the Benishangul-Gumuz region in early October killed at least 14 civilians, according to a security official. It followed similar deadly attacks in September that also displaced over 300 people, leading the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission to say it was deeply alarmed.
President-elect Joe Biden is weighing a multibillion-dollar plan for fully reopening schools that would hinge on testing all students, teachers and staff for Covid-19 at least once a week, according to four people with knowledge of the discussions.
The proposal under consideration calls for the federal government to cover the cost of providing tests to K-12 schools throughout the country. These could then be administered regularly by staff at each school, providing results in minutes.
The developing plan closely tracks with recent recommendations from The Rockefeller Foundation to invest billions into the creation of a K-12 testing system that would reassure teachers and students it is safe to resume in-person schooling. Biden has vowed to reopen the majority of schools within his first 100 days in office, amid growing concerns about the educational and mental health toll that months of remote learning has taken on a generation of students.
But such a strategy would require a sharp increase in the manufacturing of rapid tests and new lab capacity being brought online over the next several months, as well as incentives to convince states and local school districts to adopt the more intensive testing regime.
Biden transition officials are still trying to determine the exact price for regular testing in the nation's schools. One person close to the deliberations pegged the cost at between $8 billion and $10 billion over an initial three-month period.
That would likely need to be funded through a new coronavirus aid package that Biden has pledged to pursue as soon as he takes office next year.
"It's certainly the presumption of the Biden effort that there will be an opportunity for him to pass an economic stimulus Covid relief bill in the first 100 days, and in that bill should be money for schools," the person close to the deliberations said.
Biden’s transition team has not responded to multiple requests for comment.
The emerging school testing plan represents a core element of the incoming president's effort to bring the pandemic under control and get most students back in the classroom as soon as possible.
Biden said earlier this month that reopening most schools is one of his top three pandemic-related priorities. And his choice for education secretary, Miguel Cardona, spent recent months pressing for the continuation of in-person learning as Connecticut's education commissioner.
Transition officials have spent weeks developing the reopening proposal, which will likely also recommend investments in upgrading schools' air filtration systems and other infrastructure that could help guard against the virus' spread.
Several diagnostics manufacturers and labs are in ongoing discussions with the Biden team about how to source tests and implement the screening plan, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.
The transition team has also had conversations with the Rockefeller Foundation about school screening. “The Rockefeller Foundation and the Biden team are in lockstep on how to do K-12 testing,” a diagnostics industry source said.
Rockefeller Foundation spokesperson Ashley Chang declined to comment on the group’s interactions with the Biden team. “Our plan to safely reopen — and keep open — America's schools speaks for itself,” Chang said. “This can be achieved by mounting an extraordinary scale up of testing in K-12 schools, where teachers and staff are tested twice a week and students once a week through the end of the school year.”
The organization released a white paper last week that proposed testing all students once a week and teachers twice a week, at an estimated cost of $42.5 billion for the remainder of the current school year — far higher than the price tag for Biden’s nascent plan. Rockefeller suggested starting the screening program in elementary schools in early February, followed by middle schools by mid-February and in high schools by March.
The Biden team is discussing testing students, teachers and staff only once a week, and saving money and time by relying on rapid tests rather than lab-based PCR testing, according to a person familiar with the discussions. Another way to cut down on the cost of the program would be to pool samples from multiple students and test them using PCR at regional testing labs across the country that could be opened, according to the Rockefeller plan.
That strategy represents a break from the Trump administration's approach toward efforts to reopen schools. The federal government bought more than 150 million Abbott rapid tests in recent months with the goal of helping states boost testing in schools, but let states decide how to use most of that supply. Many governors chose to use the tests more broadly, limiting the help for schools, and millions of the rapid tests have not been used yet.
Trump testing czar Brett Giroir last week acknowledged that universities’ repeated testing of students and staff during the past months helped limit infections. But the HHS official pointed to recent CDC research that suggests mitigation measures like installing plexiglass shields, wearing masks, using hand sanitizer and cleaning supplies can help minimize the risk of Covid-19 spread for younger students.
“Any suggestion that the nation requires hundreds of millions or perhaps billions of more tests in order to open schools is contrary to the evidence and dangerous to our children,” Giroir told reporters.
Susan Van Meter, executive director of diagnostics lobby AdvaMedDx, said that while school-aged children appear less likely than adults to spread the virus, the risk is not zero.
“Individual member companies — and we represent all of them — are appreciating dialogue with the transition about the continual effort to ramp up testing and extend reach of testing, including for K-12 schools,” Van Meter said.
Health technology diagnostics company Color, which has worked with California officials and diagnostics manufacturer PerkinElmer to coordinate Covid-19 testing for the state’s recently opened laboratory, released a white paper and transmission model this month examining how testing could help K-12 schools reopen.
“Proactive testing of teachers and staff once or twice a week can help catch introductions early, before they spread widely through the school,” the Color paper states. “Especially in secondary schools, once- or twice-weekly testing amongst students should also be considered to further reduce the likelihood of a large outbreak amongst the full population.”
The Biden team has yet to finalize the testing plan, and several key elements that could determine its scope remain in flux. Officials haven’t determined how to incorporate private schools into the proposal, or what incentives are needed to get states and localities to follow the recommendations.
Also unresolved is whether the federal government would cover the cost of school testing programs that are already in place. And while Biden advisers and The Rockefeller Foundation have both argued that the federal government should use the Defense Production Act to increase the country’s testing capacity, it’s not clear how quickly that would increase the supply of rapid tests.
Color CEO Othman Laraki told POLITICO putting in place a K-12 screening system could be difficult, given the need to navigate the relevant science, the logistics of rolling out tests to students and teachers and the politics of building community support from parents and teachers’ unions. “The big part of this is kinda solving those three problems at the same time,” Laraki said.
Just creating enough testing capacity will be challenging, said Julie Khani, the president of the American Clinical Laboratory Association. The lab lobby, whose membership includes LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics, believes “significant investment” into new machines, testing supplies, lab staff, reporting systems and transportation logistics would be necessary.
“We remain focused on working with policymakers to ensure labs can make these investments and increase capacity for the innovative diagnostics our country needs, now and in the future,” Khani said.
Biden’s team has kept a close eye on the plan's price tag, amid worries that Republicans will resist the president-elect’s calls for passing another massive stimulus package early next year.
Officials in particular have discussed testing students, teachers and staff more frequently than once a week, but are wary that could send the plan’s cost ballooning.
"We had debates about how much you should test, should it be twice a week," said a person close to the deliberations. "But that doubles the price."
Politico
The US's largest Muslim civil rights organization on Wednesday condemned President Donald Trump's decision to grant clemency to four former Blackwater contractors convicted of killing Iraqi civilians.
National Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Nihad Awad said the decision lacks respect for the US legal system and "the sanctity of human life, especially the lives of Muslims and people of color."
"These Blackwater mercenaries were convicted of perpetrating one of the most infamous war crimes of the American occupation of Iraq. Pardoning them is an unconscionable act of moral insanity," said Awad.
The White House said late Tuesday that Trump granted clemency to 20 people, including former congressmen and the security contractors who worked for US paramilitary company Blackwater. The company has since changed its name to Academi.
Nicholas Slatten, Paul Slough, Evan Liberty and Dustin Heard, who were working in Iraq in 2007, were convicted of killing 14 Iraqi civilians in a crime that was condemned at international levels.
In March 2003, the US invaded Iraq and toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein.
The human cost of the US occupation was high with more than 100,000 civilian deaths along with evidence of torture and abuse in US-run prisons./aa
The 15 people President Trump pardoned Tuesday evening include the first two congressmen who endorsed him for president — former Reps. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) and Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), both convicted of financial crimes — two people jailed in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, and four private guards working for Blackwater who were serving long sentences for an unprovoked and unnecessary 2007 massacre of civilians in Baghdad's Nisour Square that left 17 Iraqis dead, including two boys, ages 8 and 11.
Blackwater, since sold and renamed Academi, is a private military contractor outfit headed at the time by Erik Prince, brother to Trump's education secretary, Betsy DeVos. The Nisour Square massacre marked a low point in U.S.-Iraqi relations after the 2003 U.S. invasion, and federal prosecutors spent years bringing the four Blackwater guards — Nicholas Slatten, Paul Slough, Evan Liberty, and Dustin Heard — to justice.
After a federal judge in 2009 dismissed the first murder and manslaughter convictions of the Blackwater contractors, ruling the evidence was tainted, then-Vice President Joe Biden said at a press conference in Baghdad that the men had not been acquitted and the U.S. would appeal the decision. "In subsequent years, as the case continued, the contractors became known in conservative media as the 'Biden Four,'" The Washington Post reports. Slatten was eventually sentenced to life in prison for first-degree murder, while the other three were convicted of manslaughter and given sentences of 12 to 15 years.
"Campaigns urging that the four receive presidential pardons began in earnest last year, most arguing that the men were veterans still in engaged in quasi military duties," the Post reports, noting that Trump has already pardoned two Army officers convicted or awaiting trial on murder charges for shooting Afghan civilians. In a 2009 column at Fox News, Duncan Hunter — still in Congress — called "the Biden Four" brave "political pawns" who were "sent to prison for doing their jobs."/ The Week
The Turkish Coast Guard on Wednesday rescued 12 asylum seekers whose boats were pushed back by the Greek Coast Guard into Turkish waters in the Mediterranean Sea.
A Turkish team was dispatched off Marmaris in the southwestern Mugla province after learning of a number of asylum seekers stranded on a dinghy.
The teams took 12 people in two rubber boats to the Coast Guard boat and brought them ashore.
After routine checks, the asylum seekers were taken to the provincial migration authority.
Recent months have seen multiple reports of Greek forces illegally pushing back boats of asylum seekers, endangering the passengers in the process.
Turkey has been a key transit point for asylum seekers aiming to cross into Europe to start new lives, especially those fleeing war and persecution.
Turkey hosts nearly 4 million Syrians, more than any other country in the world./aa
Ethiopian authorities have arrested at least five federal and regional officials in connection with the ongoing killings of civilians by gunmen in the western Benishangul-Gumuz region.
Scores of people died Wednesday in the latest bout of ethnically motivated killings in the Metekel zone.
The latest massacre came after a visit to the region by Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, who held a public consultation on ways of ending the killings.
In recent months, the western region that borders Sudan, where Ethiopia's $5 billion Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile is located, has seen several ethnically motivated massacres in which hundreds of ethnic Amharas were killed.
The regional communications bureau said in a statement that arrests of regional, federal and party officials suspected of involvement in the violence in any way would continue./aa
France’s highest administrative court on Tuesday prohibited police in Paris from using drones to monitor demonstrations and gatherings on public roads.
The Council of State also ordered the government to pay a sum of 3,000 euros (US$3,648) to La Quadrature du Net (LQDN), an advocacy group promoting digital rights, which had filed a complaint against the Paris police’s continuous infringement of privacy by flying the drones.
In May, the administrative court passed an order banning the use of drones in respect to the security rules imposed during coronavirus-related confinement, saying it constituted a “serious and unlawful infringement of privacy rights.”
LQDN had contended that in the wake of protests by the Yellow Vest movement, the Paris police headquarters had set up a surveillance system for monitoring large-scale demonstrations on public roads to capture real-time personal data in the video streams through the use of drones. It raised concerns that the capturing, recording and transmitting of images by the police for administrative purposes was illegal and in violation of privacy rights and the freedom of the people.
In the latest ruling, the Council of State ordered the police to cease flying drones and processing personal data, as it was likely to subject large numbers of people to “contentious surveillance measures and infringe their freedom of demonstration.”
The police had been relying on a 2015 order that allows the deployment of flying cameras without restriction "if the circumstances of the mission and the requirements of public order and safety justify it." The bill on Global Security adopted by the National Assembly in November seeks to regulate the use of surveillance drones by the police.
Last week, the Commission for Human Rights of the Council of Europe had questioned the surveillance measures proposed in the bill via body cameras worn by security personnel, airborne cameras or drones and accessing CCTV footage of public and private spaces and termed the framework to be violating international standards on the protection of privacy, personal data and freedom of peaceful assembly./aa
Britain’s communications regulator Ofcom imposed a £20,000 (US$26,720) fine Tuesday on an Indian TV station for a program that contained “uncontextualized hate speech” against Pakistanis.
The fine was imposed on Worldview Media Network Limited, whose service Republic Bharat was found to not be in compliance with Ofcom’s broadcasting rules.
The offending incident took place on Sept. 6, 2019 in an episode of “Poochta Hai Bharat,” a daily current affairs discussion program in Hindi.
In addition to the fine, Ofcom also ruled that the program not be repeated and that they broadcast a statement of Ofcom’s findings on a date and in a form to be determined by Ofcom.
The program was originally meant to discuss India’s attempt to land a spacecraft on the moon but also included a wider discussion on India-Pakistan relations.
Ofcom’s Executive, the report said, “found that this program contained uncontextualized hate speech and that this content was potentially highly offensive.”
The decision found that the program’s presenter and some of his guests conveyed the view that all Pakistanis were terrorists.
These statements included “their scientists, doctors, their leaders, politicians all are terrorists. Even their sports people” and “every child is a terrorist over there. Every child is a terrorist. You are dealing with a terrorist entity.” The presenter, addressing Pakistan and Pakistanis, said: “We make scientists, you make terrorists.”
The Ofcom report said: “We considered these statements to be expressions of hatred based on intolerance of Pakistani people based on their nationality alone, and that the broadcast of these statements spread, incited, promoted and justified such intolerance towards Pakistani people among viewers.”
Indian General K.K. Sinha was a third guest on the program, and said: “Oh you useless people. Beggars. Oh beggars, oh beggars. We will douse you with 1.25kg, .75kg-, with two inches. PoK [Pakistan-occupied Kashmir], PoK, we are coming to the PoK. We are coming to the Gilgit, Baltistan, in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa…We are going to come, be ready. People in your country are shivering with fear that the Indian army may come. We will barge inside your home in Baluchistan, in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in Karachi, in your area, in Multan, in Rawalpindi and kill you. From Lahore, from Karachi to Gilgit-Balistan when we will have control.”
Ofcom said the counter-argument they received to these statements was that they were not mean to have been taken literally, and that “Asian viewers would have understood clearly.”
Ofcom said in their decision, however: “We considered however that these statements, made by a retired Major General from the Indian Army, which clearly threatened that the Indian military would attack Pakistani civilians in their homes, were an expression of hatred and desire to kill by a figure of authority. In our view, the broadcast of these statements also promoted hatred and intolerance towards Pakistani people.”
In addition to the program referring to Pakistanis as “terrorists,” “beggars,” “thieves” and “backward,” as well as comparing them to donkeys, they were also referred to as “Paki.”
Ofcom said this was “a racist term that is highly offensive and unacceptable to a UK audience.”
Ofcom was unconvinced by the counter-argument that the term was not intended to be offensive and would not be interpreted as such in the sub-continent, saying that in their view: “these negative descriptions constituted uncontextualized abuse and derogatory treatment of Pakistani people on the ground of their nationality.”
“In Ofcom’s view, the statements made in the program, examples of which are mentioned above, were expressions of hatred based on intolerance of Pakistani people on the basis of their nationality alone, and promoted hatred and intolerance towards Pakistani people,” their decision said.
“We considered it included repeated instances of hate speech and abusive or derogatory treatment. It was therefore our Decision that this content met Ofcom’s definition of “hate speech,” it said./aa
A new design was unveiled for a mosque in the northern Indian city of Ayodhya as part of the settlement of the controversial Babri Mosque case.
Torn down by Hindu hardliners in 1992, the 16th-century mosque in the state of Uttar Pradesh, has rattled India's communal fabric for decades.
Hindu fundamentalists claimed that the site was the birthplace of one of their gods, Lord Ram and last November, the Supreme Court of India, ruled that a temple can be built at the site.
The court also ordered the allotment of five-acre land to the government controlled Sunni Central Waqf Board to build a new mosque. Subsequently, the board announced the formation of Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation to execute the construction.
Athar Hussain, secretary of the foundation, told Anadolu Agency on Monday that they plan to lay the stone foundation of the mosque early next year.
“Depending on the necessary approvals, the foundation stone will be laid either on Jan. 26 or Aug. 15. Both these days are very important for every Indian that is why we choose these two dates,” he said. “The design of the mosque and the hospital has been prepared. Designs echoes modern Architecture of mosques around the world.”
Jan. 26 is celebrated as Republic Day in India -- the day when India adopted the Constitution. Aug. 15 marks the country's Independence Day.
Hussain said that along with a mosque, community kitchen, museum and a hospital will come up, to provide state of art facilities, much needed in the nearby area and population.
“The estimate of the multispecialty hospital is around $14million. Around 2,000 people will be able to offer prayers at the same time.”
While the trust is yet to decide on the name of the mosque, Hussain says, it has been decided it will not be on the name of any king or emperor.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Aug. 5 laid the foundation stone for a “grand” temple at the site. In September, a special court acquitted all the 32 surviving accused in the case, saying the demolition "was not pre-planned."
Not acceptable
The trust has now announced plans to construct a mosque, but some Muslim leaders in India say the decision is not acceptable to the community.
“The trust has been formed by the Sunni Waqf board. The Muslim community has already rejected the proposal and now if the government wants to build any mosque, school, hospital, it is totally their outlook,” Tasleem Rehmani, president of Muslim Political Council of India, told Anadolu Agency.
“It has nothing to do with the community because it had rejected the proposal. Our demand is that the mosque should come up at the same place [where it was earlier].”
He said Muslims have rejected any mosque which is coming up at the compensation of the demolition of Babri Mosque.
Talking to Anadolu Agency, Zafaryab Jilani, secretary of All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said after the Supreme Court’s decision last year, Muslims and Personal Law Board had rejected the five acre plot given to Muslims. “Recently, there was a meeting of the Personal law board in which every member had the same view that constructing a mosque (on alternate 5 acre plot) is not allowed as per Sharia(Islamic laws),” he said./aa
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on Tuesday ruled that the arrest of Turkey's opposition politician Selahattin Demirtas in 2017 for terror charges violated his freedom of expression and right to participate in elections.
The Peoples' Democratic Party's (HDP) co-leader was being deprived of the rights to liberty, security, and freedom of choice, the ruling said.
Turkey's government accuses the HDP of having links to the PKK terrorist organization.
Demirtas was under pre-trial detention for terror charges during the 2017 constitutional referendum and June 2018 presidential elections in Turkey.
The court ruled that his freedom of political debate was limited at that time.
The court also urged Turkey to take all necessary measures for the release of Demirtas.
The ECHR also ruled that Turkey should pay “€3,500 in respect of pecuniary damage, €25,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and €31,900 in respect of costs and expenses.”
In November 2016, Demirtas along with 12 HDP lawmakers was arrested on terror-related charges.
In September 2018, Demirtas was sentenced to four years and eight months in prison after he was convicted of "spreading terrorist propaganda," “terrorist organization leadership” and “public incitement to hatred and hostility.”
A year later, the European Court ordered Demirtas’ release claiming his detention had been extended on insufficient grounds. Afterward, both Turkey and Demirtas applied to the Court's Grand Chamber and a hearing was held on March 18, 2019.
In its more than 30-year terror campaign against Turkey, the PKK -- listed as a terrorist organization by Turkey, the U.S., and the European Union -- has been responsible for the deaths of some 40,000 people, including women, children, and infants.iting by Busra Nur Bilgic Cakmak/aa