Will the Jews succeed in establishing a global kingdom?
Question: Will the Jews succeed in
establishing a global kingdom?
Answer: No, without hesitation.
The authority of their Jewish state of
the strange kind described here differs greatly from what their holy books promised
them and is entirely different from establishing an autocratic global kingdom
that enslaves the world for the benefit of the Jews as outlined in the
Protocols, where their awaited Messiah would sit on the throne as both king and
patriarch as planned. The formation of this “holy kingdom” is practically
impossible for reasons that are worth mentioning, which, while seeming to
facilitate the creation of such a kingdom, actually prevent it:
Lost Human Unity: The Failure of the
Quest for Domination
In practical terms today, the
interconnection of economic interests, transportation, and similar factors has
become so global that the continents of the world are like members of a single
living body. No crisis occurs in one country without its effects being felt in
the farthest nations, just as no part of a living body falls ill without the
other parts suffering sleeplessness and fever. This is evidence of the world's
trend toward coalition a situation that the Jews are working on and attempting
to exploit to establish their “holy kingdom.
But there is another concrete fact
that explains this trend, its extent, and its limits: human unity has no place
yet in the conscience of humanity. Loyalty to oneself, one’s family, nation,
and religion remains deeply rooted in the human conscience, all of which
prevents the formation of a global coalition that neither satisfies these
emotions nor serves the interests of all peoples.
So how can we imagine its
establishment as an autocratic kingdom that tramples all human rights and
interests for the sake of the rule of a small sect whether composed of gods or
angels let alone a sect of Jews who do not recognize the rights of others nor
respect their sanctity?
The Sterility of the Israeli Project:
Domination Without a Global Mission
No movement, whether public or
private, has ever succeeded at any time or place in combining two aspects
unless it had a mission that served the interests of both. Even if, on the
surface, one aspect was harnessed to serve the other, the movement retained its
function and the connection remained essential. The defeated party has no power
to overcome the victor without sacrificing its own interests; thus, the
connection endures, and both sides value it as long as it fulfills its mission.
However, the dominant side was weaker than the subordinate.
This is a profound secret of society,
history, and politics, which, through its simplicity, clarity, and depth,
explains many problems of history, society, and politics. It accounts for the
success of the Romans, Arabs, and Ottomans in maintaining their empires even
during periods of weak governments and armies. It also explains the successes
and eventual failures of modern colonialism. Colonial powers succeeded when
fleets served as the main means of transportation across parts of the world,
when police forces secured the seas for those capable, protected ships from
pirates, and prevented any single power from monopolizing any part of the
oceans. The British colonial rule in India was long successful because the
British acted as facilitators of communication and exchange of benefits between
India and other countries, and as mediators between the diverse regions and
competing authorities of the Indian subcontinent. This was achieved through
unified governance, the English language, European-style education, and trade;
the Indians, due to their linguistic diversity, communicated with each other
only in English.
There are factors beyond language that
foster approximation and unity among the interests of the Indians themselves,
none of which could have been realized without the British. When they
progressed along the path of union under colonial protection, they became aware
of the evils, harshness, and intrusiveness of colonial rule, even though these
hardships were initially far more severe than they eventually became. The same
can be said of the formation of the British Commonwealth, and of the Ottoman
Caliphate during its periods of extreme chaos, poverty, and corruption. When
colonial powers had exhausted their purpose, they dissolved on their own.
Similarly, the rival factions of
Quraysh, who had quarreled violently over placing the Black Stone during the
construction of the Kaaba, agreed that it should be placed first by anyone even
a servant or a child. In the same way, the bond between a husband and wife
sometimes persists even if they intensely dislike each other, because each
fears for the other’s well-being. The necessary intertwining of interests
between them such as raising children cannot be fulfilled except within the
framework of this oft-disliked marriage.
The “Israeli” kingdom, as the Jews
have envisioned it, has no global mission. The world is not prepared for it;
neither the powers of heaven nor of earth can compel all nations to sacrifice
their interests for the Jews, even if that were the will of “Yahweh, Lord of
Hosts.” There is a vast difference between the intertwining of Jewish interests
with those of individual major and minor states which is the secret of their
influence and the intertwining of these interests with the combined interests
of all nations.
Between the Logic of History and the
Illusions of Israeli Control
t appears from the course of history,
as observed by Professor Al-Aqqad, that it is moving toward the recognition of freedom
and human dignity for every individual, for these are the basis of
responsibility that distinguish one human from another, and one nation from
another. This is a deeply rooted fact in human nature, both individually and
socially, and it endures. Anything that clashes with or opposes this trend is
doomed to collapse.
The envisioned global “Israeli”
kingdom, as described here, would trample every right and dignity of non-Jews,
monopolizing benefits for themselves. There is therefore no possibility for its
establishment.
Understanding the Jewish Psyche
According to the Qur’an
The Jews do not sympathize or
cooperate except when they are scattered and feel a general threat against
them, believing that if they do not unite and cooperate, they will inevitably
be destroyed locally and globally. When they feel secure, the latent evil
within them emerges, their hearts become entrenched in corrupt blood, and
enmity and hatred flare among them. Their hatred is intense, and their fighting
is fierce; thus, if they feel safe, they are likely to destroy one another. As
Nietzsche said: “Live dangerously.”
And the Qur’an has described them
well, saying: (Even united, they would not ˹dare˺ fight against you except ˹from˺ within fortified strongholds or from
behind walls. Their malice for each other is intense: you think they are
united, yet their hearts are divided. That is because they are a people with no
˹real˺ understanding.) (Al-Hashr:14)
Their
interest lies in dispersion, which has been one of the reasons that enabled
them to dominate locally and globally and spared them from severe internal
conflicts among themselves.
The Myth of Superpower: Limits of Zionist Aspirations
There
is another fact, deserving attention even if less emphasized: their small
numbers both locally and globally. Their population in the world does not
exceed 20 million, and such a number could not succeed if gathered in one place
to dominate the world, even if each of them were endowed with the mental,
moral, and physical capacities of a hundred men. The success of Jews dispersed
and subtly influencing global affairs is one thing; their success if united and
openly revealed is another. Whether the one behind this project and promising
it is their God, “Yahweh, Lord of Hosts,” or whether the gods of heaven and
earth collectively conspired and promised it, this project is not feasible,
even if they were supportive of one another.
___________________________________________________
you may also like:
Zionism: Forces of Ascent and Seeds of Collapse
Greater Israel: Territory or Theology? Biblical Roots
U.S. Sees Israel as Its Own Myth Reborn in Palestine
___________________________
