The "Israeli" plans continue after what Donald Trump decided during his first term in December 2017, which included the implementation of the decision to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, as well as the accompanying recognition of the occupied Syrian Golan as "Israeli" territory. 

Not surprising

These developments are not surprising; rather, they are based on the resolution passed by the Knesset in 1980 to unify both East and West Jerusalem and declare it their eternal capital, a resolution recognized by the U.S. administration and Congress in 1995. Furthermore, in 1990, the U.S. passed legislation to move the embassy, which had been subject to semi-annual delays until Trump took office. 

Oslo Accords

During these latter dates, the U.S. was overseeing the Oslo Accords in September 1993, marketing itself as a peace broker in the region, advocating for a two-state solution that would secure East Jerusalem as the capital of a viable Palestinian state. 

A continuous process

All these events are part of a series that confirms that the rhythm of the Middle East has been orchestrated for decades and that the New Middle East project is not new. The alignment of decisions with their implementation is a matter of priorities for those planning for the region. While the Oslo process nominally progressed, the U.S. expanded the Zionist entity and reinforced changes. If the decision to move the embassy was a step taken three decades ago, Trump merely implemented it; this is not about individuals, but rather a continuous process for decisions that they haven't executed in the rhythm of things. 

For "Israel"

The U.S. aims, through entrenching "Israel" in terms of normalization, geography, and expansion, to crown a scheme that gradually eliminates the Arab League and replaces it with a Middle Eastern states organization, with "Israel" positioned atop it. They intend to promote a multiplicity of languages, creating entities such as a promised state for the Kurds in northeastern Syria and the Hebrew language for "Israel," ultimately diluting the Arab League so that it is led by the occupying state. 

For Security and military strategic interests

This leadership is fundamentally not tied to religious or historical dimensions, but rather to the security and military strategic interests of the U.S., as President Biden famously echoed in his speeches that "Israel" is security and a military base, not a religion or a state, when he said: "If Israel did not exist, we would create it," and "Israel exists to remain." This poses a dangerous indication of a gradual deterioration of security in the region and its states, whether or not some acknowledge this now, or if others engage in normalization to avoid confrontation, while still others remain in opposition to this conundrum. 

 Creative Chaos

The U.S. relies on a policy of "creative chaos," which has been highlighted in the media since 2006, entailing a reshaping of regimes according to its specifications. If the people's opinion prevails, alternative plans through chaos and conflict lead to a military coup that keeps control in its hands, or to the division of states while continuing to manage those in power and the factions directly or indirectly. Today, this scenario is being applied in Yemen, Syria, Libya, and Sudan, whereas they control regimes that align with their interests or through military coups that suppressed and crushed the peoples' revolutions, leaving the Arab homeland without elections or a voice for the people to this day.

Conflict of priorities  

Today, the rhythm that America is trying to set coincided with discussions about multipolarity in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war that began in February 2022 and continues to attract parties and change interests, reaching October 7, 2023, with the "Al-Aqsa Flood" and the involvement of Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, and Iran in the confrontation under what is known as the "Unity of the Arenas." The threads have intertwined, scattered, and priorities have changed, with Gaza and its ongoing resistance remaining the key to the situation and its survival.

New equations

This situation imposed new equations that the U.S. is trying to organize to its own tune by neutralizing Iran and Iraqi groups, managing the post-Assad period, engaging the Lebanese parties with each other, and arranging presidential elections. Meanwhile, failure persists in containing Yemen and breaking Gaza, suggesting that setting the rhythm still faces significant obstacles.

Syria

In the case of Syria, the success of applying the new Middle East vision involves the division of the state, legitimizing "Israel's" existence in the Golan Heights and beyond, in a context hinting at Druze federalism, while the Kurds demand federalism in northeastern Syria, directly supported by the U.S. Lebanon, however, is dealt with differently, away from division through military solutions that would clear southern Litani of "Hezbollah" and restrict its movements to weaken its political influence, thus keeping the south under "Israeli" oversight, informed by their 1982 experience of remaining there and establishing the Lebanese general Antoine Lahad's forces that collaborated with them.

The historic dream of "Israel

The most dangerous aspect of setting the rhythm for them is the implementation of a historic dream for "Israel": the annexation of the West Bank and the establishment of the settlers' state "Judea and Samaria." This means the cancellation of Palestinian sovereignty, the destruction of the state project even to the extent of viability, and the displacement of the population into large urban gatherings, compelling many to flee under the force of arms used by settlers and soldiers towards the eastern border to Jordan, which they consider the alternative homeland for Palestinians. On July 18, 2024, the Knesset issued a decision to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, coinciding with the U.S. veto in May 2024 against establishing a Palestinian state. Prior to this, the occupation army confiscated areas classified as "B" under the Oslo Accords, meaning that practically, what remains under Palestinian sovereignty is only 6% of the West Bank, which is a direct execution of international law and a blatant disregard for the Arab Peace Initiative issued by the Arab League at the Beirut summit in 2002, which calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state followed by normalization with "Israel."

Today, within the framework of the rhythm that America is trying in vain to impose, it will clash with the steadfastness of the Palestinians, which is a historical fact, alongside sudden changes in the positions of Syria and its internal developments, successfully maintaining its unity and avoiding division, as well as the role that "Hezbollah" will play in the current ceasefire situation extended to the end of January.

Thus, Gaza remains the key to the situation and the key to the failure of establishing this rhythm.

--------------

Read the article in Arabic

The unparalleled economic and military strength of the United States continues to drive American leaders toward making extreme decisions aimed at reshaping the world according to the desires of America and its allies. Comparing American power to that of other great powers in both the present and the past often pushes American policymakers to the brink of madness.

Despite closing hundreds of bases in Iraq and Afghanistan recently, the U.S. still maintains about 800 military bases in over 70 countries and regions worldwide, according to "Politico." In contrast, Britain, France, and Russia combined have only around 30 bases outside their territories.

On the economic front, the United States' GDP reached approximately $27.36 trillion in 2023, representing about 24% of the global economy. This means nearly a quarter of global economic activity is generated by the U.S.

The arrogance of power led a former U.S. president and presidential candidate like Trump to promise expanding the territory of the Zionist entity to make its defense easier! As if the world is an American estate to be manipulated at will.

Lessons Unlearned

Undoubtedly, America's military and economic power infects a considerable portion of its thinkers and politicians with unprecedented arrogance in human history. They see themselves as demi-gods capable of doing whatever they please to the world and fail to learn from past lessons.

If the excessive force backed by America, as used by the Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has turned Gaza into ruins and now extends to Lebanon to kill more people and destroy institutions and social norms, similar actions were undertaken by Nixon and Johnson in Vietnam, leaving them dragging the tails of defeat. The same happened with George Bush Sr. and George Bush Jr. in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet, Vietnam did not bow, Iraq did not surrender, and Afghanistan inflicted a humiliating military defeat on them.

A Changing World

The world of the early 21st century differs greatly from that of the first half of the 20th century, whether during World War I, the Sykes-Picot era, or the aftermath of World War II.

During the 1920s, the American economy saw significant growth, with GDP rising from $687.7 billion in 1920 to $977.0 billion in 1929. This period, known as the "Roaring Twenties," was characterized by rapid industrialization, technological advancement, and increased consumer spending.

After World War II, the American economy continued to grow, with GDP reaching $300 billion in 1950 and exceeding $500 billion by 1960. This economic boom, often referred to as the "Golden Age of Capitalism," saw widespread prosperity and significant expansion.

Asia during that time was not the Asia of today, neither economically nor militarily. Japan was defeated and submissive, and the rest of the continent was struggling for independence.

Fierce Economic Rivalry

Today, Asia stands as an economic power that could collectively surpass the American economic giant. China alone, the second-largest economy in the world, has a GDP of approximately $18.5 trillion, representing about 15% of the global economy, followed by Japan at $5.5 trillion and India at $3.9 trillion.

Asia's nominal GDP totals approximately $40.65 trillion, with a purchasing power parity value of around $78.84 trillion. This means Asia accounts for about 37% of the global economy in nominal terms and around 72% when measured by purchasing power parity.

Africa and Latin America, too, are struggling to break free from imperial domination and are on the verge of achieving economic independence, which will shake the world.

As for the Arab world, the combined GDP of Arab countries stands at approximately $3.5 trillion, with a nominal purchasing power value of $8.4 trillion. This positions the Arab economy at about 3.2% of the global economy in nominal terms. The Arab people are discontent with American hegemony and will not remain silent for long against its role in perpetuating their backwardness and dependency.

Arab uprisings against Zionist arrogance, supported by America, will not cease until all forms of occupation, dominance, and plundering are eradicated.

The BRICS Challenge

The BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) together represent a significant portion of the global economy, collectively accounting for about 35% of the world's GDP when measured by purchasing power parity. This makes them a major global economic power, surpassing the G7 in combined GDP. BRICS was established specifically to challenge American economic hegemony, primarily through strategies such as de-dollarization.

De-Dollarization

Among its announced economic, social, political, and cultural objectives—such as economic cooperation, development financing, political coordination, and cultural exchanges—de-dollarization stands as the most critical goal, one that will reshape the world.

De-dollarization is a significant step toward achieving financial sovereignty and reducing dependence on a dominant currency. This movement has gained considerable momentum as countries seek to reduce their exposure to potential economic sanctions and dollar-value fluctuations. The push for de-dollarization stems from the desire to achieve financial sovereignty and minimize reliance on a single dominant currency.

The development of alternative payment systems, such as "CIPS" and the "Mir" payment system, is a significant accomplishment. Initiatives like the "BCBPI" and other regional payment systems are expected to bolster the global financial landscape.

While the challenges and considerations associated with de-dollarization are significant, the long-term benefits of achieving financial independence and reducing exposure to potential economic shocks make the endeavor worthwhile.

A Failure to Understand Reality

The evidence is overwhelming that the ground is slipping beneath America's feet as it continues to violate all norms, laws, and humanitarian values. Efforts to escape American dominance persist.

However, many political decision-makers in the U.S. and "Israel" remain convinced that they can sustain hegemony and control by fostering chaos and power vacuums. From their perspective, chaos and power vacuums will lead to the emergence of states and societies aligned with the preferences of Israel's right-wing rulers. But as Thanosys Kambanis, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation, notes, history proves otherwise. Direct occupation may suppress resistance temporarily, and total destruction may defeat rebellion. However, mass killing and displacement will never suffice to solve the political and security problems facing "Israel." Instead, they are likely to exacerbate these problems in the long run.

Comprehensive war may occasionally achieve its declared goals, Kambanis adds, but at a horrific cost in lives. Even if "Israel" achieves an absolute military victory this year or next, it will inflict a deep wound that will last for decades.

Rational Voices

Kambanis argues that policymakers in the U.S. are delusional. Chaos and power vacuums are unlikely to result in the emergence of states and societies aligned with the policies preferred by Israel's right-wing rulers. Therefore, the U.S. should call for an immediate halt to the invasion of Lebanon and end "Israel's" war in Gaza. The U.S. has the power to persuade "Israel" by limiting shipments of offensive weapons.

If America ceases its direct involvement in delivering bombs to the most extreme elements in Israel's wars, it could end its direct participation in the emerging regional war.

Yet, the voice of reason seems absent in both Tel Aviv and Washington. The U.S. appears headed for another round of prolonged wars.

-------------------------------------------------------------

1- https://www.worlddata.info/largest-economies.php.

2- https://www.thebalancemoney.com/roaring-twenties-4060511.

3- Global GDP 1985-2029 | Statista.

4- https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/asia-on-the-cusp-of-a-new-era.

Read this Article in Arabic