![logo-footer-1.png](/images/2023/04/29/logo-footer-1.png)
The English website of the Islamic magazine - Al-Mujtama.
A leading source of global Islamic and Arabic news, views and information for more than 50 years.
Tunisia’s Ennahda Movement said on Friday that its deputy head Noureddine El-Beheiry was abducted and taken to an unknown destination.
In a statement, the movement said: “The Movement’s Vice-President and member of parliament Noureddine El-Beheiry was abducted, today, morning.”
According to the statement, El-Beheiry was abducted by “security forces with civilian clothes and taken to an unknown destination.”
“During the abduction, security forces rebuked El-Beheiry’s wife Saeeda al-Akrimi,” the statement added.
The movement “strongly" denounced the incident that as "predicting Tunisia’s entry into the tunnel of tyranny and the liquidation of political opponents outside the framework of the law by the coup regime after its failure to manage the ruling affairs.”
Tunisian authorities are yet to comment on Ennahda’s statement.
El-Beheiry, 63, is a lawyer and politician and served as the justice minister in 2011-2013 and then became a minister accredited to the prime minister in 2013-2014.
Tunisian President Kais Saied ousted the government on July 25, suspended parliament, and assumed executive authority. While he insists that his "exceptional measures" are meant to "save" the country, critics have accused him of orchestrating a coup./aa
Wildfires fueled by strong winds and downed power lines in the Western US state of Colorado have destroyed about 600 homes, a shopping complex, and a hotel, according to local news reports late Thursday.
The fire, which started in the morning in Boulder County, reached populated areas in a short time, with winds gusting up to 169 kilometers (105 miles) per hour.
Over 30,000 residents across three communities outside the state capital Denver were forced to evacuate Thursday afternoon, said public news outlet NPR.
Hundreds of homes and buildings have burned in the area, NPR added, citing authorities.
While the National Weather Service for Denver and Boulder called the situation in the area "life-threatening," Boulder County's Office of Emergency Management ordered residents in both the city of Louisville and the town of Superior to quickly evacuate the area.
Residents in most parts of the Broomfield are also now under a mandatory evacuation order, the report added.
"Due to the magnitude of this fire, the intensity of this fire and its presence in such a heavily populated area, we would not be surprised if there are injuries or fatalities," said Boulder County Sheriff Joe Pelle.
At least seven people have been so far injured and are undergoing treatment, officials announced Thursday evening.
Earlier, Colorado Governor Jared Polis declared a state of emergency in response to the wildfires.
"Prayers for thousands of families evacuating from the fires in Superior and Boulder County," Polis said on Twitter.
"Fast winds are spreading flames quickly and all aircraft are grounded," he added.
Dry weather and high winds have made winter wildfires more likely in Colorado, Colorado Public Radio reported, adding that this is a pattern likely to become more frequent due to climate change./aa
A year of economic turbulence has sunk the Turkish Lira to new lows, and retail investors across Turkey (now Turkiye) are racing into cryptocurrencies in a desperate race to protect their savings from drastic devaluations.
President Tayyip Erdogan has revealed that a cryptocurrency bill is prepared and ready to be presented to the Grand National Assembly (Turkey’s legislative chamber), and some analysts have been quick to allege that it is partially in response to significant capital outflows into digital assets such as Tether and Bitcoin.
But the crux of the issue rests in the (in)stability of the Lira – bleeding out 40% of its value this year – something halted only for a fleeting moment by a promised currency support package earlier in December.
The Lira’s perilous downturn can be directly attributed to a combination of continual cuts to interest in face of a uncurtailed covid-fuelled inflation rate, a knife in the back of an economy recovering from a 2018 debt crisis.
Erdogan’s plan involves the Turkish state indexing Lira deposits to protect them against future decline relative to hard currencies via state-backed reserves. The hope is to reassure citizens and stem the flow of capital fleeing the national currency.
This move briefly halted downside pressure for the Lira as markets felt reinvigorated by the increase in citizen’s purchasing power.
However, the fickle reality of a 30% month-on-month inflation rate alongside a drastic imagining of the fiscal debts required to sustain the deposit protection scheme quickly smacked the Lira back down to new all-time lows.
What could Erdogan’s crypto bill have in store?
Surprisingly, there is a palpable air of optimism about the legislation amongst the Turkish crypto community, analysts at Blockworks have been quick to highlight that there has been no significant divergence between Lira and stable coins such as Tether – with the value still tracking USD – suggesting that there has been no flight of capital out of crypto on local exchanges.
This is reassuring for crypto markets, and would suggest that the bill is likely to offer a favorable crypto regulatory regime that will ensure investor protections (and more importantly for Erdogan – formalise taxation rules and monitoring) – it could even take aim at creating attractive conditions to lure in the lucrative digital asset economy.
All of this would be a remarkable twist of fate – earlier this year the President declared ‘We are at war with Bitcoin’.
However, far from a change of heart, it is likely that the regulations have been carefully designed to lay the foundations for a so-called Digital Lira, which forms a key part of Turkey’s current economic development framework (an attempt to get back in track by 2023).
In order to introduce the planned CBDC, first and foremost, it is necessary for the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey to be granted the powers to exercise in the digital currency space. This is likely to inform the structure and undertone of any legislation passed, behind the guise of investor protections, taxation, and capital outflows./ Coin Rivet
The Biden administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to uphold its vaccine-or-testing mandate for large U.S. companies, as several business groups and GOP-led states seek to block the rule.
“The nation is facing an unprecedented pandemic that is sickening and killing thousands of workers around the country, and any further delay in the implementation of the [rule] will result in unnecessary illness, hospitalizations, and deaths because of workplace exposure to [Covid],” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said in the filing.
Earlier this month, a federal appeals court reinstated the administration's Covid vaccination policy for large private businesses after an earlier court ruling halted one of President Joe Biden’s key measures to increase vaccination numbers.
Biden announced the policy in September, stating that businesses with 100 or more employees must ensure their workforces are fully vaccinated, or require workers who aren't vaccinated to wear masks and show negative Covid test results at least once a week. Employers can face fines for not complying.
Several GOP-led states and business groups are involved in a lawsuit challenging the rule, arguing that it exposes companies to financial risk for refusing to comply and threatens their workforces.
In a 2-1 ruling, a panel for the Ohio-based 6th Circuit said the Occupational Safety and Health Administration workplace order for businesses with at least 100 employees was valid.
Prelogar argued in the filing that OSHA has the power to implement the rule through existing law after business groups and some states asserted that the agency lacks the authority.
"The OSH Act unambiguously grants OSHA the authority to promulgate emergency temporary standards without any exception for standards that might have large economic or political significance, and the issuance of the [rule] does not conflict with any other statutory provision," she said in the court filing.
"Congress, moreover, has specifically directed OSHA to use its existing regulatory authorities 'to carry out COVID-19 related worker protection activities' and has appropriated funds designated for OSHA to address workplace exposure to COVID-19," Prelogar said.
OSHA has said that it would not issue citations tied to its Covid vaccination mandate before Jan. 10, so that companies have time to implement the requirements. The federal agency also said there would be no citations related to its testing requirements before Feb. 9. The mandate was previously slated to take effect Jan. 4.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on challenges to the vaccination and mask requirements for large companies on Jan. 7. /NBC
CATANIA, Italy (Reuters) - The German charity vessel Sea Watch 3, carrying hundreds of migrants rescued at sea, will dock in the Italian port of Pozzallo, in Sicily, the charity group operating it wrote on Twitter on Friday.
The vessel has been seeking a port to disembark for the past week, since rescuing the migrants from the Mediterranean.
"The 440 people on board will finally be able to disembark," Sea Watch said.
Those onboard, mostly from Africa, were rescued late last week in five separate operations. They include around 200 minors, most of them unaccompanied, a Sea Watch spokesperson said.
On Tuesday, Italy allowed more than 550 people onboard another charity boat to disembark in the Sicilian port of Augusta.
A cleaning worker at a Florida zoo who was attacked by a tiger after putting his arm into its enclosure could be criminally charged, authorities said Thursday.
A Collier County sheriff’s deputy fatally shot the tiger at the Naples Zoo on Wednesday evening after it would not release the man’s arm from its mouth.
The sheriff's office said in a statement that an investigation would determine whether charges would be filed against the injured worker, but it did not say what the charges could be.
Sheriff Kevin Rambosk defended the decision of his deputy to fatally shoot the the 8-year-old Malayan tiger named Eko, which officials have said had the 26-year-old man's arm in its mouth and would not let go.
Body camera video released Thursday shows a deputy asking if a tranquilizer is available and being told no, and unsuccessful efforts to distract the animal before the officer fires.
“Our deputy did everything he could do in that situation and he ultimately made the only possible decision he could in order to save this man’s life,” Rambosk said in a statement.
The man was flown to hospital in serious condition Wednesday. An updated condition was not available for him Thursday.
Naples Zoo marketing director Courtney Jolly said that that when the zoo is open there is a team present that includes a shooter and lead darter, but the zoo was not open when the attack occurred.
The zoo on its website also said it supports the decision to shoot Eko, and that “resolving this situation with a tranquilizer dart would not have been appropriate given the immediate crisis.”
The man worked for a cleaning company responsible for restrooms and a gift shop and was not authorized to be where he was, officials have said.
He breached one barrier and stuck his arm through the fence of the tiger’s enclosure and the tiger grabbed it, the sheriff’s office said./NBC
Pakistan has expressed serious concern over the widely reported open calls by Hindutva proponents for carrying out genocide of Indian Muslims.
“Today, the Indian chargé d’affaires was summoned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamabad, and asked to convey the government of Pakistan’s serious concerns to the government of India over the widely reported open calls by Hindutva proponents for carrying out genocide of Indian Muslims,” said a statement issued by the Foreign Office on Monday.
According to the FO, these violent hate speeches were made during the “Dharma Sansad” held at Haridwar, Uttarakhand, on December 17-20.
“It was impressed upon the government of India that it was highly reprehensible that the Hindu Raksha Sena’s Prabodhanand Giri and other Hindutva figures who called for ethnic cleansing have neither expressed any regret nor the Indian government has condemned or taken any action against them so far,” the FO deplored.
The statement said it was conveyed to the Indian side that the reported hate speeches had been viewed with grave concern by civil society and cross-section of the people of Pakistan and around the world. Regrettably, the toxic narrative against minorities, particularly Muslims, and their persecution understate patronage had become a norm under the current Hindutva-driven BJP-RSS combine government in India, it added.
It was reminded to the Indian side that such incitement to violence by Hindutva figures, including ruling party’s elected members, also preceded the anti-Muslim riots in New Delhi in February 2020.
The FO said the continued grave violations of human rights of minorities, especially Muslims, and their places of worship, anti-Muslim legislation by the Union Government of India and several BJP-ruled states, and continued incidents of violence against Muslims on flimsy pretexts by Hindutva groups with complete impunity and often under state patronage highlighted the worsening trend of Islamophobia and present a grim picture about the fate of Muslims in India.
“Pakistan calls on the international community, including the United Nations, OIC and relevant human rights organisations, to hold India accountable for its gross and systematic human rights violations against minorities, particularly Muslims, and take immediate measures to save them from impending genocide,” the FO statement said, adding that India is expected to investigate these hate speeches and incidents of widespread violence against minorities, particularly Muslims, and their houses of worship and take measures to stop such incidents from recurring in future./ dawn
Book Excerpt | ‘Jains and Hindus were most likely to not be willing to accept a neighbour from another community.’
“Indians may not always accept that they hold conservative positions on religion. One beloved narrative about India is that while political parties might trade in the business of communal polarisation for votes, the average Indian is actually a liberal person who looks forward to his colleague’s invitation for a home-cooked Eid feast and brings celebratory sweets to the office for Diwali, as the stereotype from innumerable Indian advertisements indicates. The truth is more complicated. Not every Indian might want their religion imposed on the whole country, but that doesn’t mean they want to be friends with people from other religions, let alone accept them as part of their community or family.
In a 34-country Pew survey, India was above the median in its support for people to have the right to practise their religion freely. On the whole, Indians would appear to see religious tolerance as a central part of who they are as a nation. Across all major religious groups, most people said it was very important to respect all religions to be ‘truly Indian’ and that respecting other religions was a very important part of what it meant to be a member of their own religious community. Newspaper headlines quickly seized on this finding to reiterate the beloved position that Indians were, on the whole, tolerant of all religions.
But We Are Not All That 'Liberal'
But more specific questions that do not allow for broad hand-waving about tolerant beliefs uncover deep religious illiberalism and, indeed, outright hostility. A majority of Hindus in India see themselves as very different from their Muslim compatriots (66 per cent), and most Muslims feel the same way, saying they are very different from Hindus (64 per cent). Over a third of Hindu respondents in a 2019 national survey considered Muslims to be unpatriotic (although the Muslim respondents did not feel that way about themselves). Forty per cent of Hindus in a four-state survey and 43 per cent of Sikhs considered Muslims to be mostly violent, while Muslims did not consider people from any religion to be mostly violent.”
The above is an excerpt from from Whole Numbers and Half Truths: What Data Can and Cannot Tell Us About Modern India by Rukmini S, published by Context, an imprint of Westland Publications. Rooted in hard facts and the messy political reality of India, the book presents a portrait of today’s India and uses numbers to interrogate and reimagine it. Continued excerpt:
“The housing segregation that Muslims in particular experience is borne out by data. Jains and Hindus were the most likely to not be willing to accept a neighbour from another community – particularly Muslims. Thirty-six per cent of Hindus were not willing to accept a Muslim neighbour, while the distaste for Hindu neighbours was much lower at 16 per cent among Muslims. In a 2015 experiment, decoy prospective tenants with upper-caste Hindu, Dalit and Muslim surnames answered rental listings in and around Delhi. Despite being identical in every other way, all upper-caste decoys were met with a positive response – the landlord expressed a willingness to give the accommodation on rent.
On the other hand, 59 per cent of prospective Dalit tenants received a positive response, 23 per cent received a positive response but with differential terms and conditions (including higher asking prices), while 18 per cent were rejected. In the case of Muslim decoys, only one of every three received a positive response, another 36 per cent got a positive response with conditions and a full 30 per cent were rejected outright.
Growing Up in a Muslim 'Ghetto'
Sana Iqbal grew up in Delhi’s Jamia Nagar, an area she describes as a Muslim ghetto. Having studied in the United Kingdom and worked in Mumbai, where she met her husband, Iqbal was certain that she wanted to live in a more mixed area when the couple moved to Delhi in 2018. “We weren’t bothered about neighbours. We just wanted to live in an area where you can buy Southeast Asian ingredients and get a drink – the usual yuppie stuff,” the documentary filmmaker said self-deprecatingly. After seven weeks of unsuccessful house-hunting and over fifteen discussions that fell apart after their names were revealed, their broker suggested that they change their names, and the couple gave up and returned to the familiar embrace of Jamia Nagar. “To my mind, this is ghettoisation—being forced to live with your own community because no one else will have you,” she said.
When people from other religions are largely unacceptable as neighbours, crossing the boundary into accepting them as family is an intolerable thought for most.
In a large national survey, 85 per cent of people said that marriage between two people of different religions was not acceptable. Young people in their late teens and early twenties were even more likely than older people to say that inter-religious marriage was unacceptable, and neither income nor education made people more likely to accept inter-religious marriage.
Preventing inter-religious marriages animates far more Indians than is commonly believed. Across a range of religious groups, large majorities said that it is very important to stop people in their community from marrying into other religious groups. Roughly two-thirds of Hindus in India wanted to prevent inter-religious marriages of Hindu women (67 per cent) or Hindu men (65 per cent). Even larger shares of Muslims felt similarly: 80 per cent said it is very important to stop Muslim women from marrying outside their religion, and 76 per cent said it is very important to stop Muslim men from doing so.
India's Youth Aren't Very Progressive Either
Younger people do not have much more progressive beliefs; a 2017 survey on the attitudes of young people found that six out of ten respondents supported banning movies that hurt religious sentiments, even more so among Muslim youth; 70 per cent of Hindu youth were opposed to allowing anyone to eat beef, and one-third of young people opposed inter-caste marriage.
Muslims in India do not demonstrate more tolerance to people from other religious groups than Hindus; the difference lies in the patronage and State backing that muscular Hindu majoritarianism now receives.
Muslim youth were much more likely than others to report having experienced religion-based discrimination. About one in every seven or 13 per cent of them said they had been discriminated against based on their Muslim identity. Muslim youth living in smaller cities were most likely to have been victims of religious bias – 27 per cent reported having faced discriminatory treatment for being Muslim.
When Shoaib Received a Graphic Threat
Shoaib Akhtar (twenty-five) grew up in an affluent family in Aligarh in Uttar Pradesh, the son of a university professor and captain of his school’s cricket team. “Up until college, I can honestly say that I personally experienced very little discrimination. It was more something I read of in the papers than experienced,” he said. All that changed when Shoaib completed a business degree and was sent to Bharuch, a town of 1,50,000 people in the western state of Gujarat, an outpost of the petrochemicals company he had landed his first job with.
“I think the idea of a young Muslim man who was better educated than them, wore more expensive clothes and had the latest phone rankled them even more,” he said of his now-former colleagues. In the beginning, there was a slight distance, reminders that the office was vegetarian, and some pointed talk in Gujarati about Modi when Shoaib was around. Things escalated quickly to him being reprimanded for speaking to a female colleague (“About accounts! She was the accountant!”) and being told that he couldn’t wear a skullcap during the holy month of Ramzan. One morning, Shoaib opened his office email to find a graphic death threat from an unknown email address. Two weeks later, he was out. “It wasn’t the end – it was just the beginning of my realisation of what being Muslim in India is like now,” he said from Toronto, Canada, to where he migrated in 2019. “I still can’t post a tweet about an Indian batsman playing a loose shot without someone calling me a [cuss word for Muslims]. At least they aren’t my colleagues and neighbours now.”
There is some evidence that India has become more muscularly majoritarian. A survey of young Indians found that more than half of those surveyed (53 per cent) felt that people had become less tolerant of the views of others and one-fourth of the youth (23 per cent) said that they had hesitated in expressing their opinion on a political issue.
Youth from religious minorities like Muslims and Sikhs, who were more likely to bear the brunt of this intolerance, were likelier to agree that people had become less tolerant.”/ The Quint
Advertisement by a cancer hospital in Meerut denying admission to Muslims, rising Islamophobia in India and a five-year old tweet by BJP MP Tejasvi Surya have added fuel to the fire.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday finally called for unity and brotherhood in dealing with the threat posed by the coronavirus. No, he did not unequivocally condemn people, many of whom his supporters and some who he follows on social media, for their Islamophobia and their abusive, hateful messages blaming Muslims for spreading the virus.
What he did was tweet, something he is remarkably good at. His tweet read, “ COVID-19 does not see race, religion, colour, caste, creed, language or borders before striking. Our response and conduct thereafter should attach primacy to unity and brotherhood. We are in this together.”
The problem is that tweet has come a little too late and is too little. The immensely popular prime minister can make amends by going on national TV, another exercise he is good at, and tell people that blaming Muslims for the virus is nonsense; that ostracizing and boycotting Muslim traders and vendors is anti-national; that such behavior has shamed the country and that he would like to reassure the minority community that he and his government stand by them.
With localities having put up signs asking Muslims to keep away, with vegetable vendors being asked to produce proof of their religious affiliation and calls going out from rabid and short-sighted Hindus for boycotting shops owned by Muslims and products sold by Muslims, the situation is toxic as never before. And the least the Prime Minister can do is to at least speak to the nation, again something at which he is brilliant.
But a mild, statesmanlike tweet falls short of what is needed. Nor is the Government’s move to ship 5.5 million pills of Hydroxychloroquine to the United Arab Emirates is going to repair the damage and regain the goodwill among the people there. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation also tweeted on Sunday, expressing its concern and calling upon the Indian Government to protect minorities in India.
The Ministry of External Affairs, however, has been blandly denying persecution of minorities, dismissing all such reports as false and misleading. It may however find it difficult to defend the surge of Islamophobic messages by Indians in Islamic countries and kingdoms. A backlash has already started and some Indians have also lost their jobs there.
Islamophobic messages on social media by Indians living in the UAE, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries—an estimated 8-10 million of them, have been impacted by the irresponsible conduct of a few bigots that the PM has done little to admonish.
A Kuwaiti pointed out that out of 1654 COVID-19 patients there, over 900 of them happen to be Indians. But while nobody was being discriminated there on the ground of religion and are being treated in the same hospital, why is a hospital in India denying admission to Muslim patients?
Not surprisingly, a five-year old tweet by the present BJP MP Tejasvi Surya has gone viral in Gulf countries. Tweeted Noora Al Ghurair, “Pity your upbringing Tejasvi Surya, that respect for women couldn’t be instilled in your despite having India having some great female leaders”. She went on to add, “Please note if some day your government bestows a foreign ministry to you, avoid travelling to Arab lands. You are not welcome here. This will be remembered.”
The Hindu right has brazenly launched a multi-pronged attack, simultaneously targeting Christians, Muslims and other minorities along with anyone who speaks against the BJP regime.
By: RUBEN BANERJEE
The irony rang out perhaps as loudly as the jingle bells this Christmas day. Marking the Christian festival, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a statesman-like statement, recalling the teachings of Jesus Christ while appealing for harmony among people of all religious faiths.
However, hordes of right-wing Hindu fanatics who form the core of the support base of Modi’s nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spared no effort in spreading fear and discord that very same day.
From the town of Agra in the north to Mandya in the country’s south, Hindu zealots descended on the streets in droves to disrupt Christmas celebrations and strike terror. They barged into churches and prayer halls and noisily halted congregations. At some places, they assaulted pastors and people who had come to pray. In one particular town, they staged a demonstration chanting slogans against Santa Claus. They dispersed only after setting on fire an effigy of the legendary bearded character known to shower gifts on children the world over.
The hatred on display across India that day was shocking, but not entirely surprising. Modi’s BJP believes in Hindu majoritarianism and wants to convert India into a nation where Hindus enjoy primacy over people of other faiths.
Ever since Modi propelled it to power – first in 2014 and then again in 2019 – the party’s offensive to get Hindus to call the shots in a country whose constitution swears by secularism has gotten louder. The party’s allies and associates, including activists drawn from various outfits aligned with RSS – considered the ideological fountainhead of the ruling BJP – have also become brazen and bolder.
Emboldening the Hindu zealots are obviously the doublespeak of the BJP leaders, including Modi. For record’s sake, they strike the correct notes and stress the need for cultural amity and religious harmony from time to time.
But alongside the posturing that makes for good optics and burnishes their stature globally, the party top brass also allows the religious hotheads to have a free reign within the country’s boundaries. For them, it makes immense political sense to rally their core support base and keep them primed for political battles.
Crucial state elections are due next year in several states, and BJP hopes to reap electoral dividends by exploiting religious fault lines that have always existed and polarising the electorate further. The simple calculation is that Hindus would vote for BJP that fashions itself as a Hindu nationalist party.
The objective being so obvious, the footsoldiers of the cause for Hindu supremacy are on overdrive. India, consequently, is awash with instances of religious thuggery and bigotry.
Just two weeks ago, several Hindu organisations came together to host a religious summit in the pilgrim town of Haridwar in Uttarakhand state where speaker after speaker – all dressed in ochre robes and claiming to be monks – spewed venom against other minorities. While one called for Hindus to take up arms to defend their faith, another argued for a Myanmar-style cleansing of other faiths. According to him, the violent persecution of Rohingyas was a template worth emulating.
The hatred freely voiced in Haridwar is echoing elsewhere too. In another meeting in capital Delhi, a notorious television anchor known for bigotry administered an oath to the participants for being prepared either to kill or be killed in defending their faith. Fed on such toxic speeches, many are already acting on them and minorities – both Christians and Muslims – are increasingly coming under attack.
According to estimates, some 300 churches have been targeted across the country between January and September this year. The cow, considered holy by Hindus, has also become a polarising animal. According to a 2019 Human Rights Watch report, some 44 people have been lynched in the country by cow vigilantes for either cow smuggling or possessing beef.
It is not that such mindless violence fired by misplaced beliefs is a recent phenomenon. They pre-dated Modi, and hundreds were lynched, for example, in the eastern state of West Bengal for an assortment of reasons in the 1980s. Christians, too, were periodically attacked.
But what sets the current round of lawlessness apart is perhaps the complicity of the establishment in condoning them. For one, the police took no less than four days to register a complaint against the hate speeches made in Haridwar, and no arrests have been made to date. And when a Muslim bangle seller was assaulted by Hindu vigilantes in the city of Indore for daring to stray into a predominantly Hindu neighbourhood, it was the victim who spent months in jail for ‘outraging’ the modesty of a girl based on the accusations of his assailants.
This pattern of government ‘patronage’ is playing out regularly with petrifying consequences for the minorities. A Christian pastor who was assaulted was himself arrested on a host of charges ranging from disturbing the peace to encouraging religious conversions.
In Gurugram adjacent to Delhi, mobs of Hindu fanatics have disrupted Muslim Friday prayers at designated open spaces week after week without much consequence. In fact, the chief minister of Haryana – the region’s highest elected official – has batted for the disruptors, saying prayers at public places would be banned.
The Hindu hotheads believe they are defending their faith in a country where Hindus make up an overwhelming 80 percent of the population. But a recent survey by the Pew Research Center shows that their religion is under no kind of danger; religious conversions are rare, and Hindus gain as many people as they lose. For the fanatics though, these are just inconvenient details that they can ignore as they lead India down the path of mobocracy./TRT
Disclaimer: The viewpoints expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, viewpoints and editorial policies of Al-Mujtama.