![logo-footer-1.png](/images/2023/04/29/logo-footer-1.png)
The English website of the Islamic magazine - Al-Mujtama.
A leading source of global Islamic and Arabic news, views and information for more than 50 years.
The Turkish Red Crescent (Kızılay) distributed educational materials to 1,260 Rohingya refugee students at seven schools in Pakistan’s Karachi.
The aid was provided in cooperation with the Pakistan Red Crescent and the Pakistan Alliance for Girls Education (PAGE), an umbrella organization working toward building an enabling environment for gender equity in education, employment, rights and leadership.
A ceremony marking the distribution of the educational materials was held in Karachi's Gulshan-e-Iqbal region and attended by Turkey's Karachi Consul General Cemal Sangu, officials from the Turkish and Pakistani Red Crescent organizations and other guests.
Ibrahim Carlos Camilo, head of the Turkish Red Crescent delegation in Pakistan, said the students showed great interest and were very happy to receive the educational materials.
More than 700,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled from Buddhist-majority Myanmar to refugee camps in Bangladesh since August 2017, when the Myanmar military launched operations in response to attacks by a rebel group. Myanmar security forces have since been accused of mass rapes, killings and the burning of thousands of homes.
A United Nations-sponsored investigation in 2018 recommended the prosecution of Myanmar’s top military commanders on charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity for the violence inflicted against their country's Rohingya./DS
France has taken over the rotating EU presidency for the next six months, an opportunity the president, Emmanuel Macron, will no doubt use to nudge Europe towards his goal of greater “strategic autonomy” in the world. Some in Brussels worry that hotly contested presidential elections in April could interfere with France’s EU presidency before a key conference on the future of Europe delivers any results. It’s not reassuring that Macron’s decision, temporarily, to fly the blue and gold EU flag at the Arc de Triomphe in Paris has already drawn the fury of far-right and conservative election candidates.
But many European Muslims are concerned about the French stint in the EU chair for another reason: they fear that France’s divisive anti-Muslim political discourse will seep dangerously into EU policymaking.
The French election campaign essentially means it is open season on Muslims in France. Many French politicians have adopted rampant Islamophobia as an electoral strategy. Toxic debates on Islam and Muslims, mixed with acrimonious intersectional swipes at race and migration, are becoming increasingly venomous.
Alarmingly, Muslim-bashing is no longer the preserve of the far-right anti-immigration candidate Marine Le Pen. Macron’s hardline interior minister, Gérald Darmanin, accused Le Pen, during a recent television debate, of going “soft” on Islam. The former TV pundit Éric Zemmour has brought an even more vicious anti-Muslim agenda to the presidential contest, while candidate for the Gaullist Les Républicains party, Valérie Pécresse, is taking a hard line on immigration, having previously banned the wearing of burkinis at outdoor leisure centres in the Paris region.
Macron himself, who is expected to seek re-election, is already enforcing a spate of anti-Muslim policies, including a bill supposedly aimed at preventing “separatism” and the emergence of a “counter society” among France’s six million Muslim citizens. Macron’s government is also under criticism for shutting down the Collective Against Islamophobia in France, a leading anti-discrimination body which documents anti-Muslim hate crimes. The European Network Against Racism warns of a full-blown “Islamophobic witch-hunt” of French Muslims and says the government is using “countless administrative procedures” to close down Muslim-led organisations, mosques, schools, and even Muslim-owned snack bars, on unproven claims of links to the Muslim Brotherhood.
But the fear now is that France will use its EU presidency to push for even tougher Europe-wide measures.
It’s a reasonable fear in the context of French ministers calling out Helena Dalli, the European commissioner for equality, for meeting members of Femyso, the Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations, a network that also participated in a Council of Europe anti-discrimination campaign focusing on hijabs. That campaign caused a political outcry in France as an attack on its “values”. Dalli rightly defended meeting Femyso representatives to discuss challenges facing young European Muslims as “a result of stereotyping, discrimination and outright hatred”. Attacking Dalli for the meeting, Marlène Schiappa, the citizenship minister in the Macron government, said Femyso was an “Islamist association” that was “attacking France” and “infiltrating” EU institutions, allegations which Femyso flatly denies and which its president, Hande Taner described in a statement as “laughable”.
An intervention by the French government with the European Commission meanwhile prompted a delay which led ultimately to the cancellation – ostensibly for administrative reasons – of planned EU funding for another rights group, Alliance Citoyenne, which has defended the right of Muslim women to swim in public pools wearing burkinis.
My own reports and articles on France and Europe written over the years note a persistent unease about Islam as an alien faith, Muslims as undesired foreigners and an irrational fear of the hijab and of halal food. Diatribes conflating Islam, extremism and terrorism are a tediously recurring phenomenon at both formal and informal gatherings.
France’s Muslim-panic has parallels elsewhere. In Austria the former chancellor Sebastian Kurz took aim at the alleged rise of so-called political Islam after the launch of a much-criticised website called “Islam map” which shows the locations of more than 600 mosques. The map, according to rights groups, has led to incidents of violence against Muslims.
Denmark’s former immigration minister, Inger Støjberg , was given a jail sentence recently for illegally ordering the separation of young asylum-seeking married couples from Syria and Iraq, where the woman was under 18. Seeming to implicitly link Islam and refugee policy as is often the case across Europe, Støjberg had said she wanted to protect “child brides”. She previously caused controversy by arguing that Danish Muslims be kept out of work places during Ramadan because daylight fasting could create safety hazards. Støjberg has now been impeached, and may be a political outlier, but it is hard not to see Denmark’s hardline approach to “integration” and refugees, including a June law which enables it to transfer asylum seekers outside the EU while their cases are being processed, as at least partly driven by a fear of Muslims.
The Austrian academic Farid Hafez raises troubling questions too about the motivation behind the Vienna forum on countering segregation and extremism in the context of integration, an annual conference launched by Austria with the support of France and Denmark to fight “political Islam” and so-called “non-violent extremism and Islamism”. If not outright McCarthyism, as Hafez calls it, such initiatives are a dangerous step towards prejudging all Muslims as a potential threat to liberal societies.
Once restricted to the EU’s far-right groups, France’s fixation with Muslims has extended across the European political landscape; Islam is seen either as a threat to national secular traditions or to the idea of “Christian Europe”. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and his EU allies have long raged against Islam, but dog whistling to anti-Muslim extremists is becoming the standard pattern for many mainstream EU conservatives.
Even without chalking up any major electoral victories (so far), far-right parties have in effect succeeded in mainstreaming their hostile narrative on Muslims and migrants. No wonder hostility and discrimination towards Europe’s Muslims is widespread as the EU’s own Fundamental Rights Agency warns. The 2020 issue of the annual European Islamophobia report, co-edited by Hafez with scholars, experts and civil society activists from more than 30 European countries, concluded that anti-Muslim racism has worsened across the continent.
There are bright spots. In Germany, which welcomed more than a million refugees from Syria and other countries in 2015, the new governing coalition has promised a “modern immigration country”.
EU governments and the European Commission are – quite rightly – struggling against violations of the rule of law, attacks on the judiciary and the erosion of media freedoms in Hungary and Poland. But they have turned a blind eye to policies and actions that reinforce exclusion and prejudice in some western EU member states.
Being a European Muslim has never been a walk in the park. With about one-third of French voters saying they will vote for far-right and ultra-nationalist candidates, France’s Islam-panic is likely to escalate in the coming months.
Despite the EU’s lofty talk of equality, diversity and non-discrimination, European Muslims should be braced for a tough start to the new year.
Shada Islam
Oil prices climbed on Friday from supply concerns following protests due to high fuel prices in Kazakhstan and supply outages in Libya.
International benchmark Brent crude was trading at $82.77 per barrel at 0702 GMT with a 0.95% rise after closing the previous session at $81.99 a barrel.
American benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) traded at $80.19 per barrel at the same time for a 0.92% gain after it ended the previous session at $79.46 a barrel.
In the previous trading session, Brent recorded its highest level at $82.83 a barrel since Nov. 24 when a record high was set at $83 a barrel.
'Unrest in Kazakhstan is the current main contributor to bullish sentiment and whilst details are sketchy in regard to supply disruption it seems that the 1.6 million bbl per day pipeline is flowing freely,' said Matt Stanley, director of the commodity brokerage firm, Star Fuels.
On Wednesday, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev approved the resignation of the government following protests that began in western Kazakhstan on Jan. 2 over an increase in the price of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and later spread to other areas of the country before going nationwide.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a Russia-led military alliance, sent peacekeeping troops on Thursday to Kazakhstan.
A state of emergency was declared in the commercial capital Almaty and the oil-rich Mangystau region to ensure public safety.
Political instabilities in Libya and related supply outages also contributed to rising oil prices.
'Libyan oil output is already a realized bullish supply-side risk that has been developing since mid-December when it became clear that the 24 December elections would be delayed and the country’s political trajectory left in limbo,' Rystad Energy’s Senior Oil Markets Analyst, Louise Dickson, said.
Oil output has plummeted to 729,000 barrels per day (bpd) due to upstream shutdowns and unexpected pipeline maintenance, according to Libya's National Oil Company.
Dickson said should the political standoff between the Libyan National Army and the UN-backed Government of National Accord continue, she expects an increase in outages, whether due to operators shutting in production to force political outcomes, or if protestors are organized to shut down operations as key ports, as was the case in January 2020./aa
A young Muslim community rights activist says she is being harassed by Thai authorities for speaking up for disenfranchised villagers in a Muslim-majority province of southern Thailand.
Khairiyah Rahmanyah, an 18-year-old first-year university student and observant Muslim who wears a hijab, is facing a charge of having violated an emergency decree by participating in a sit-down protest outside Government House in Bangkok last year on behalf of a Muslim community in Thailand’s south who say their lands and livelihoods are being threatened by the construction of a large industrial estate.
Late last year several villagers from Chana district of Songkhla province traveled to Bangkok to protest the planned development of an industrial zone in their area, only to find themselves arrested and charged with various offenses. Among those charged was a septuagenarian, rights groups said.
“What the police have done to the people of Chana who came peacefully to demand answers from the government clearly shows that this is a government working for tycoons before the people,” said Pornpen Kongkachonkiet, director of the Cross Cultural Foundation.
“This further demonstrates that this government has no respect for the people.”
Khairiyah and several other young Muslims continued protesting on behalf of the 1,500 affected villagers despite facing harassment from police, rights activists said.
It is sickening to see police resort to legal means to bully demonstrators who are calling for fairness in their own land
The planned industrial estate, whose construction is currently on hold, has long been opposed by villagers who say the sprawling zone would lead to their disenfranchisement.
However, several senior officials in Bangkok have been pushing for it despite opposition from villagers.
After police in Bangkok issued summons for Khairiyah this week, a group of political science students at the Prince of Songkla University in the predominantly Muslim province of Pattani in southern Thailand issued a statement calling for authorities to stop their prosecution of the teenage student activist.
“It is sickening to see police resort to legal means to bully demonstrators who are calling for fairness in their own land and demanding the right to determine the future of their own communities,” members of the student union wrote in their statement posted on Facebook on Jan. 4.
“We would like to encourage students from all universities to join our fight for justice [on behalf of the villages] and stand up for the right to the freedom of expression for all.”
The student union also called on the government to honor its promise to conduct proper consultations with the villagers before any further decisions are made on the project.
Thailand is one of the world’s most unequal nations where the top 1 percent own two-thirds of the country’s wealth and powerful business conglomerates routinely violate the rights of disadvantaged people with impunity, rights advocates say.
“In Thailand money talks and poor people have no say,” a young pro-democracy activist in Bangkok told UCA News on condition of anonymity. “But we will continue speaking out against injustices so we can empower people to fight the system.”/ ucanews
When we read of unspeakable acts of cruelty in history, we often wonder how such a thing was possible. These were not individual acts of barbarism or aberrations in the system; these were commonplace and considered to be normal.
In Nazi concentration camps, throwing Jewish babies into the air and shooting them for practice was a sport. During times of slavery, white mothers stood by casually and watched as black children were torn away from their mothers and sold to other slave owners.Closer home, the practice of considering a person ‘untouchable’, denying them basic human rights and brutally punishing them for transgressions, was considered to be par for the course. When we read of unspeakable acts of cruelty in history, we often wonder how such a thing was possible. These were not individual acts of barbarism or aberrations in the system; these were commonplace and considered to be normal. How is it that so many people could be convinced to think that it was alright to subject another human being to such violations?
The simple answer is that they didn't see them as human beings. The oppressors saw their victims as less-than human, who didn't have the same capacity to think and feel. They felt it was fine to subject them to medical trials, perform experimental surgeries without anesthesia, make products out of their skin and hair, use them as beasts of burden until the breath left their bodies. As a species, humans are convinced that there is us and then there are all other forms of life in the pyramid. By dehumanising an entire population, we rid ourselves of the guilt of subjecting them to any amount of cruelty because ‘it’s not the same’ as doing it to 'one of us.'
As the details of the Bulli Bai app case unfold, many are shocked that young people ranging from 18-21 years of age are allegedly behind holding online auctions of Muslim women. How could they be so full of hatred when they are so young, is the question being asked. But if you go through the hundreds of social media profiles of Hindutva proponents, you will arrive at a better word that describes what they harbour — contempt. In their minds, the people they’re targeting are not human. This may seem like an exaggeration, but it is important to understand that this did not happen overnight. The slow poison of othering the Indian Muslim has always existed in our social, cultural and political fabric; it received a boost with the demolition of Babri Masjid in 1992 and the pogrom in Gujarat in 2002, two instances of blatant Hindutva muscle power. Since 2014, when the rewards for these violations were reaped, it has become the lifeblood of this fabric.
Featured Videos from TNM
Some say that Narendra Modi was elected for ‘development’ despite Gujarat. But the widespread polarisation, mainstreaming of communalism, and popularity of the leader in spite of failures on several economic fronts, says otherwise. It was not ‘despite’ Gujarat, it was ‘because of' Gujarat. Ardent supporters of the PM’s party, the BJP, do not bother to dress up this fact any more. While a few may parrot the line about the PM receiving a ‘clean chit’ for the Gujarat pogrom, many others openly call for violence on par with 2002 to teach the Muslims a “lesson”. In May last year, actor Kangana Ranaut tweeted that PM Modi must show his “virat roop from early 2000s” to “tame” West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Bannerjee. Kangana’s Twitter account was permanently suspended shortly after this for hate speech, but she received her fourth National Award from Vice President Venkaiah Naidu in October the same year.
What used to be limited to RSS shakhas and VHP camps is loudly proclaimed on television, with anchors brazenly endorsing it, and amplified in political platforms across the country. This anti-Muslim rhetoric has consistently equated Muslims with animalistic behaviour. Derogatory references to what they eat, how they pray, who they fall in love with, what work they do, how they celebrate, how many children they have, how they treat women are commonly thrown around not only in WhatsApp university but are platformed by political leaders, including the PM and his trusted aide, the Home Minister. The strategy isn’t new. It is closely modeled on fascist principles, inflaming nationalism and providing an ‘other’ as a target to blame for anything and everything. From an elephant eating a pineapple laden with explosives to the spread of the coronavirus in the country, the right wing has found ways to fan Islamophobia in every possible situation. The trick, simultaneously, is to project the great leader, the representative of the majority, as the victim of the deviousness of the ‘other’.
The consequence is an ecosystem where crimes against Muslims are vocally justified, defended, celebrated openly. Even the gangrape and murder of an eight-year-old Muslim girl. Calls for genocide are not universally condemned. FIRs are not filed automatically. Nobody is punished. The media sides with the perpetrators. Celebrities copy-paste tweets that protect the great leader. The great leader never condemns any of it. In fact, there are many within the right wing who feel Modi is “too soft”. The vitriol spewed by the ‘trads’ (or traditionals) within the right wing is so acidic that they face opposition from the Hindutva 'Lite' members in the community. For the ‘trads’, the dehumanisation of Muslims is complete and they tomtom it with pride. The rest have dehumanised the Muslims too, but are yet to accept it because they don’t want to believe that they’re Nazi followers, yet. At least publicly.
It’s not surprising at all that young people are indulging in crimes such as the Bulli Bai app when crimes against Muslims are not considered to be crimes anymore. It gives them a sense of power and identity that they may not derive from anywhere else. The narrative that they’re somehow contributing to nation-building gives the enterprise a noble air. The anonymity offered by the internet makes it all the more attractive.
The need for political leaders across the spectrum to constantly reaffirm their ‘Hindu’ identity, whether it’s Rahul Gandhi, Mamata Banerjee or Arvind Kejirwal, shows that they realise they will alienate the electorate if they don’t do this. Even in Tamil Nadu and Kerala, where rationalist politics is still popular, leaders are careful not to hand a stick to the BJP to beat them with. They are in the Opposition but they cannot come up with a strategy that can stand up against the rabidness of the right wing. The people have been bitten and the infection has spread.
The 2019 film Jojo Rabbit, directed by Taika Waititi, tells the story of Nazi Germany through the eyes of a 10-year-old boy who is a Hitler fan. When he finds a Jewish girl hidden in his home by his mother, he is astonished to discover, bit by bit, that she is actually human, just like him. The film isn’t an exaggeration. It’s how the Nazis thought about the Jews. It was reality, once upon a time. A reality that we look back to in horror and read about in school textbooks with our mouths wide open. It is the reality we are in today, but do not acknowledge.
We’re still busy asking if not him, who? When future generations look back at us, do you believe they will think we asked the right question? Should it not be — if we don’t stop now, then when?/ thenewsminute
Judge bans delay of mosque construction months after lawsuit accused city of denying permits due to anti-Muslim bias
A US federal judge has ordered a Mississippi city to approve plans for a mosque to be built in the area, months after a lawsuit was filed claiming the plans were denied due to anti-Muslim prejudice.
The judge issued an order on Monday, which would pave the way for the mosque's construction, ban the delays of any permits, and force the government of Horn Lake, Mississippi to pay the mosque builders $25,000 for incurred expenses, as well as attorney fees for the plaintiffs.
In November, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit against Horn Lake on behalf of Riyadh Elkhayyat and Maher Abuirshaid, co-founders of the Abraham House of God, who had submitted a site plan for the mosque that "met or exceeded" all requirements, according to staff for the city's planning commission, cited by the ACLU.
"We are heartened and relieved that we are able to move ahead with our plans for a mosque in Horn Lake, which will provide a critical local house of worship for my family and other Muslims in the community to gather and practice our faith freely and without discrimination," Elkhayyat said in a statement.
Heather Weaver, senior staff attorney for the ACLU's religious freedom programme, said: "The consent decree entered by the court today is an important victory for religious freedom. It affirms the fundamental principle that the government may not base its decisions on bigotry against a particular faith."
The two co-founders have been seeking to build what would be the first mosque in DeSoto County, where they say Muslim families currently have to cross state lines into neighbouring Tennessee in order to attend their nearest house of worship.
Despite there being 13 churches in the city of Horn Lake, there are no mosques in the area where the two plaintiffs said there is a "thriving" Muslim community of 15 to 20 families.
However, their plans were initially rejected by the commission and its Board of Aldermen, the city's governing body.
Anti-Muslim sentiment
According to the complaint, the board said it rejected the plan on the basis that the mosque would create traffic and violate noise ordinances. But the ACLU rejected this argument, pointing out that no evidence was provided to make these claims, and that the submitted plans did not include speakers or noise amplifiers.
The complaint said that board members showed the real reason for the application's rejection: anti-Muslim bias.
According to the lawsuit, one board member told local media: "I don't care what they say, their religion says they can lie or do anything to the Jews or gentiles because we’re not Muslims."
"If you let them build it, they will come. So I think we need to stop it before it gets here," they said./ middleeasteye
A court in France sentenced six police officers to prison for violence and racist insults during the arrest of an Egyptian man last year, local news reports said Thursday.
The officers, who uttered racist slurs and commited assualt while detaining 29-year-old Samir Elgendy in Paris in April 2020, were sentenced by the Bobigny Court to terms ranging from six to 12 months.
"I am happy, justice has been done. I have been wronged, assaulted. I’m happy with this decision," said Elgendy.
Laurent-Franck Lienard, the lawyer of one of the police officers, said they would appeal the court's decision, adding the court did not consider any of the evidence they presented.
Meanwhile, Arie Alimi, Elgendy’s lawyer, emphasized that the court’s decision is a victory against racism and violence within the police department.
*Writing and contributions by Jeyhun Aliyev from Ankara, Turkiye/aa
The wife of a senior Tunisian politician started a hunger strike Thursday in protest against his continued detention.
Saida Akremi, whose husband Noureddine Bhairi is the deputy chairman of the Ennahdha party, told Anadolu Agency that security personnel at the hospital where her husband has been transferred have refused to provide her with food.
"I started a hunger strike in protest of the continued imprisonment of my husband and for denying food for me," Akremi said.
Bhairi, 63, was transferred to Habib Bougatfa Hospital in the northern city of Bizerte after his health deteriorated due to his hunger strike.
"Despite denying me food, I was not subjected to any pressure or mistreatment, whether by the medical staff or the security officers at the hospital," Akremi said.
She added that she tried to convince her husband to end his hunger strike, but he refused.
On Wednesday, his doctor, Hatem Ghadoun, warned that his condition is serious in light of his hypertension and diabetes along with heart issues.
On Monday, Interior Minister Taoufik Charfeddine accused Bhairi of being involved in terrorism-related activities for allegedly issuing false identity documents to a Syrian couple while he was serving as justice minister, with one of the individuals previously linked to terrorist cases committed outside Tunisian territory.
The Ennahdha party, the largest party in the now suspended Tunisian parliament, said the accusations against Bhairi are "politicized" and called for his immediate release, holding President Kais Saied and Charfeddine responsible for his well-being.
Saied ousted the government on July 25 last year, suspended parliament and assumed executive authority. While he insists that his "exceptional measures" are meant to "save" the country, critics have accused him of orchestrating a coup./aa
The UN Human Rights chief on Thursday said authorities in Kazakhstan must stick to strict “requirements of necessity and proportionality” after police said dozens of protestors had been killed in rioting in Almaty.
Michelle Bachelet said her office had heard alarming reports of deadly violence in Kazakhstan, including 12 police officers killed in Almaty, the country’s main city.
She urged all, including security forces and protestors, to refrain from violence and to seek a peaceful resolution of grievances.
“International law is clear: people have the right to peaceful protest and freedom of expression,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in a statement.
“At the same time, protesters, no matter how angry or aggrieved they may be, should not resort to violence against others.”
A state of emergency declared in several areas on Jan. 5, including in Almaty and the capital, Nur-Sultan, has been extended to all of the former Soviet republic in central Asia, including an 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. curfew until Jan. 19.
The UN office quoted an Almaty police spokesperson, saying that security forces had killed dozens of protesters.
In addition, almost 1,000 people have reportedly been injured in the protests, which began on Jan. 2.
According to the Kazakh Interior Ministry, 12 law enforcement officers have died in the unrest, and 317 police officers and members of the National Guard have been injured.
Riot police allegedly used tear gas grenades, and flashbang grenades in clashes with demonstrators in Almaty, said the UN.
- Seized government buildings
Protesters seized some government buildings in the city, setting them on fire, and attempted to storm police stations.
According to reports, on Jan. 6, intense shooting erupted between the military and armed individuals in front of Almaty city hall.
Bachelet said lethal force, particularly live ammunition, should only be used as a last resort against specific individuals to address an imminent threat of death or severe injury.
“States do have the right to declare states of emergency under certain narrow circumstances, but any derogation of human rights is subject to strict requirements of necessity and proportionality,” said Bachelet.
“Certain rights, including the right to life, the prohibition against torture and other ill-treatment, and the right not to be arbitrarily detained continue to apply in all circumstances,” she said.
The request by the Kazakh authorities for foreign security forces to be sent to the country to maintain and restore public order under the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) should be guided by international law standards, said the UN.
Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia are members of the CSTO.
According to Kazakh officials, more than 2,000 people have been taken into police custody.
Bachelet called for all those arrested and detained solely for exercising their rights to peaceful protest and freedom of expression to be released and for all allegations of human rights violations to be promptly, independently, and thoroughly investigated./aa
Turkiye's first indigenous combat aircraft will emerge from the hangar in 2023, the nation’s president announced on Thursday.
The jet, called Turkish Fighter, will make its maiden flight in 2025, Recep Tayyip Erdogan told a mass opening ceremony of 16 factories that will operate in the Space and Aerospace Industry Zone in the capital Ankara, an engineering hub for manufacturing the groundbreaking jet fighter.
"It will take its place in the skies in 2029 as the strike force of the Turkish Air Force, after successfully completing its test procedures," said Erdogan.
Some 2,300 engineers involved in the project will carry out their work at this hub, Erdogan stressed.
Turkiye is among the elite club of the 10 countries of the world that can design and build their own warships and is also among the top three drone producers, Erdogan said.
Touting the growth of Turkiye’s defense industry over the last two decades, under the rule of his Justice and Development (AK) Party, Erdogan said the number of its defense industry projects topped 750.
Erdogan said their budget also jumped to $75 billion and annual turnover rose to $10 billion./aa